As many of you already know, we have a Paltalk room called “Catholics Building Bridges: Sane Christian Discussion.” For more information about the room, please click here. Some of our discussions are found on our Podcast Page, which I know, desperately need updated. As our room’s Frappr Map shows, we have a variety of people who join us for our regular voice/text discussions. Since many people who come to our room are not Catholic, it inevitably brings up the question of ecumenism. The Christian section on Paltalk is a very turbulent place, where sarcasm and accusations are more common than charity and understanding during Christian discussion. This is a shame. However, we try to foster a charitable environment that stands in contrast to other rooms. This is why we emphasize “sane” in our title.
It seems almost every time we open the room these days the topic of ecumenism comes up. How do we do it? With whom do we do it? What is the best way to go about it? How does the trial of Martin Luther relate to ecumenism (sorry…inside joke)?. Being Catholic, we accept the Catholic Church’s views on ecumenism, which many of us describe as a kind of “faithful ecumenism” or “continuum ecumenism,” or simply “sane ecumenism.” In this post I want to give a basic outline of what the Catholic Church teaches about ecumenism. Perhaps describing the various ways others do ecumenism is a helpful way to begin to explain our own way of doing it. Note that we do not view ecumenism in either of these ways as the full truth.
1. Lowest Common Denominator Ecumenism - This is the ecumenism of the mainline Protestant churches and of the World Council of Churches, and as a whole, it has been a failure. In striving for unity (a good thing), many of these churches have downplayed or abandoned doctrines and practices that defined their churches and made them meaningful. I once heard about the planning of a local ecumenical service where they took down every cross in the church where it was being held, for fear of offending a fellow Christian. The cost of unity in this example? Utter blandness. They had a church service with nothing offensive in it, but nothing meaningful in it either. Important doctrines have received the same treatment using this type of ecumenism. The Unitarians may get offended at mention of the Trinity, so we can’t mention that in our churches anymore. The “Our Father” offends the feminists, so we can’t use that either. The Episcopalians are uncomfortable with Luther’s strong emphasis on justification by faith alone, so we can’t preach on that. This goes on and on and on. This ecumenism, in my opinion, is unfaithful because it results in the loss of the most divisive, but often the most meaningful, beliefs and practices of a denomination. In a way, distinctiveness and division are often so closely related, that getting rid of divisive beliefs and practices leads to a loss of distinction. I should note that not all mainlines have taken this approach, and that the decline of emphasis on common beliefs/practices in the mainlines is not simply because of the ecumenical movement.
2.Exclusionary Ecumenism- There is a church nearby that considers itself the one true church, a mighty strange concept considering it was founded in the 1950s in rural Ohio, but nonetheless, that is the claim. This church refuses to engage other Christians, or even grant them salvation. This is the other extreme of ecumenism, which avoids the topic entirely. We often run into people who hold this view on Paltalk. Many consider ecumenism “of the devil,” although most have in mind the “lowest common denominator” ecumenism mentioned above. Nonetheless, they are quite uncomfortable with any kind of dialog with other Christians, unless it involves yelling sarcastic remarks at them. Some Catholics we often meet on Paltalk, on the cusp of being schismatic, also take this view. They get so sick of the Catholic-bashing they see on Paltalk, that they are quite willing to abandon the whole ecumenical process, despite their anti-ecumenical stances going against current Catholic Teaching on the matter. While I can sympathize with their views, I still believe them to be unfaithful, because ecumenical work is good in that it is trying to fulfill Christ’s prayer that we all may be one. Failing to even try to reach out to other Christians is, in my opinion, uncharitable, and as I already stated, contrary to current Catholic Teaching on ecumenism.
Now it is time to get to the Catholic view. Just so everybody knows, the Catholic Church still teaches that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, a view held by the earliest Church Fathers. However, on account of baptism and other sacraments of non-Catholics, we can speak of non-Catholic Christians as being somehow in a limited communion with the Church, thus able to be saved. Notice how classic Apostolic Truth is applied to a denominational context with this Teaching.
Catholic ecumenism is a mixture of the two extremes types of ecumenism mentioned above, but ultimately it is beyond either. The goal of Catholic ecumenism is to work with other Christians to the extent that it is possible without compromising Apostolic Truth. So the distinctive (and divisive) Catholic dogmas aren’t going away anytime soon, but nor is the Church going to cease her ecumenical work. So while the Catholic Church isn’t going to change substantially because of ecumenism, the Church does consider ecumenical implications when Teaching and formulating responses to new problems.
In order to retain Apostolic Truth while reaching out in charity, Catholic ecumenism happens on a continuum or sliding scale so-to-speak. We work with other Christians at varying ecumenical levels. Since the Catholic Church considers the Orthodox Churches to be “true Particular Churches” with valid sacraments and succession, the Catholic and Orthodox Churches are practically “sister Churches” in the eyes of the Catholic Church. Thus, our relationship with Orthodox Christians is one of (theoretical) ecumenical closeness. However, further down the continuum are Protestant churches. While the Catholic Church is not willing to blanketly consider Protestant sacraments valid, Catholics believe that Protestants, by virtue of their baptisms, may be called our “brothers and sisters” in Christ. In other words, yes, Protestants can be saved. Catholics believe that Protestants are in an imperfect communion with the Church because of their baptism. Thus, ecumenism, although more limited than what we can have with the Orthodox, follows naturally, because these “separated brethren” are truly our brothers, despite our separation. Further down on the Continuum are other Christian groups and non-Christian religions. We have the most limited ecumenical contact with these groups. Here is an outline of the implications of the levels of ecumenism:
Orthodox - share sacraments (Orthodox may commune in our Churches, and Catholics may commune in Orthodox Churches, although Orthodox Christians often do not allow this), share a common history, pray together as fellow Catholic Christians, have respectful dialogue, and stand together on moral and ethical issues held in common.
Protestant- pray together as fellow baptized believers in Christ, have respectful dialogue, stand together on moral and ethical issues
Non-Christian- pray together in a limited, generic way, as fellow believers in God, have respectful dialog, stand together on moral and ethical issues
I believe that this continuum approach is the most sane way to do ecumenical dialog. The hope is that we will become closer to other churches, while not compromising the Apostolic Truth. Indeed, dialogue often helps us, at the least, to see how words divide us, when actual belief does not. This is the case in our dialogue with non-Chalcedonian Orthodox Churches, where language describing the mystery, rather than any fundamental disagreement about the mystery, seems to be the major point of contention.
Evangelicals often share the Catholic vision for ecumenism, although with some differences. Many evangelicals want to reach out with other Christians with whom they agree on “the essentials,” yet they do not wish to compromise the truth to do so. They lament the compromise ecumenism of the mainline churches, to which many of them belong. So while evangelical ecumenism is motivated by a kind of essentials based invisible church, and ours is based on the idea of a real, visible Church reaching out to her separated brothers and sisters, nonetheless, they agree with us that ecumenism must not compromise basic Christian truth, but that ecumenism must happen.
Before I finish up, I should note that some consider Catholic ecumenism a sham. Those on the mainline left believe we are too stubborn, and they wish we would be more affirming of other denominations. Because the Catholic Church is not willing to compromise her understanding of the nature of the Church, many believe we are actually uninterested in ecumenism. I get asked a lot, “if Catholics really want to improve ecumenical relations, why don’t you have open communion?” Those on the Catholic right see Catholic ecumenism as a sham as well, and believe we shouldn’t even bother working with Protestants. While I can understand these objections, Catholic ecumenism is, in my opinion, the best balance of Truth and Charity. The Catholic Church (and Orthodox Churches) should not be expected to change Apostolic Truth simply because we live in a denominational Christendom. However, in the name of charity, the Church moves forward with faithful ecumenism.
Let me end with a practical example of the way we try to do ecumenism. We have a few reformed Protestant chatters who frequent our Paltalk room. One, Greg, just started a blog named Evangelical Fire. Please pay him a visit. While we do not agree on everything, we still have charitable and open discussions in a safe and friendly environment. We have learned about his faith and he has learned about ours, and we are all richer for it. We even pray together and lament the current state of morality in the Western world. Another reformed chatter, named HopeinChrist, is active in our room too. While we don’t always agree, and sometimes get into some very frank discussions, we always do so in charity and friendship. We try to understand one another and try to find areas where we agree, without smoothing over the areas where we disagree. In the end, I think we are all better off for having had an open, respectful, and frank dialogue.
Ecumenism, done faithfully, charitably, and frankly, yet without compromising the Apostolic Faith, is difficult. Sometimes we Paltalk room admins throw up our hands and repeat this as a mantra: Faithful Ecumenism is difficult, Faithful ecumenism is difficult. However, we Christians are often called to difficult things, and by the grace of God, we will continue our faithful ecumenism.
Photos taken by me.