<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comment&#252;s on: Youtube in Reverse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/</link>
	<description>The Ancient and Future Catholic Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Simple Sinner</title>
		<link>http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>A Simple Sinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perchristumblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;"I am also wondering if the decision was reversed so quickly because of all the attention the vid was getting. Clearly, the PP strategy was backfiring."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Once it is brought to light the question then becomes "Do we ban everything or allow everything?"  No favorites can really be played.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You will note as much pro-Catholic content is on YouTube as this drek.  We post a bit of it here!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;From a business standpoint, does YouTube want to alienate that source of content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><b>&#8220;I am also wondering if the decision was reversed so quickly because of all the attention the vid was getting. Clearly, the PP strategy was backfiring.&#8221;</b></i></p>
<p>Once it is brought to light the question then becomes &#8220;Do we ban everything or allow everything?&#8221;  No favorites can really be played.</p>
<p>You will note as much pro-Catholic content is on YouTube as this drek.  We post a bit of it here!</p>
<p>From a business standpoint, does YouTube want to alienate that source of content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perchristumblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Good news indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. J.</title>
		<link>http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perchristumblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>I am also wondering if the decision was reversed so quickly because of all the attention the vid was getting.  Clearly, the PP strategy was backfiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also wondering if the decision was reversed so quickly because of all the attention the vid was getting.  Clearly, the PP strategy was backfiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. J.</title>
		<link>http://blog.ancient-future.net/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perchristumblog.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/youtube-in-reverse/#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>I am just wondering....I saw an excellent, well thought out and professionally executed vid by ALL that I would never have seen otherwise because of this fiasco. Maybe we should occassionally just publish these vids so they get more exposure.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Call me a radical, I know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just wondering&#8230;.I saw an excellent, well thought out and professionally executed vid by ALL that I would never have seen otherwise because of this fiasco. Maybe we should occassionally just publish these vids so they get more exposure.</p>
<p>Call me a radical, I know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
