Guess who wrote this…
See Combox for the author.
“I do not deny that there are differences between the Churches, but I say that we must change our way of approaching them. And the question of method is in the first place a psychological, or rather a spiritual problem. For centuries there have been conversations between theologians, and they have done nothing except to harden their positions. I have a whole library about it. And why? Because they spoke in fear and distrust of one another, with the desire to defend themselves and to defeat the others. Theology was no longer a pure celebration of the mystery of God. It became a weapon. God himself became a weapon!
I repeat: I do not ignore these difficulties. But I am trying to change the spiritual atmosphere. The restoration of mutual love will enable us to see the questions in a totally different light. We must express the truth which is dear to us – because it protects and celebrates the immensity of the life which is in Christ – we must express it, not so as to repulse the other, so as to force him to admit that he is beaten, but so as to share it with him; and also for its own sake, for its beauty, as a celebration of truth to which we invite our brothers. At the same time we must be ready to listen. For Christians, truth is not opposed to life or love; it expresses their fullness. First of all, we must free these words, these words which tend to collide, from the evil past, from all political, national and cultural hatreds which have nothing to do with Christ. Then we must root them in the deep life of the Church, in the experience of the Resurrection which it is their mission to serve. We must always weigh our words in the balance of life and death and Resurrection.
Those who accuse me of sacrificing Orthodoxy to a blind obsession with love, have a very poor conception of the truth. They make it into a system which they possess, which reassures them, when what it really is, is the living glorification of the living God, with all the risks involved in creative life. And we don’t possess God; it is He who holds us and fills us with His presence in proportion to our humility and love. Only by love can we glorify the God of love, only by giving and sharing and sacrificing oneself can one glorify the God who, to save us, sacrificed himself and went to death, the death of the cross.
But I would go further. Those who reproach me with sacrificing truth to love have no confidence in the truth. They shut it up, they lock it up like an unfaithful woman. But I say, if the truth is the truth, we must not be afraid for it; let us give it, let us share it, let us show it in its fullness, let us welcome all that there is of light and love in the experience of our brethren. If we continue in this attitude, then truth will become clear of itself, it will conquer all limitations and inadequacies from within, on the basis of the common mystery of the Church. Let us enlarge our hearts, “let each one of us, as the apostle says, look not to our own things, but rather to the things of others” (Phil. 2:4). We have a sure criterion – life in Christ. Faced with a partial expression of the truth, let us ask in what measure it conveys the life in Christ, or in what measure it is liable to compromise it.
H/T:Eirenikon

March 28, 2008 at 12:37 am
Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras I (Constantinople)
(1886-1972)
March 28, 2008 at 1:21 am
There is lots to like in this passage from the Patriarch, but I particularly like his opening insight. What most divides us East and West is not doctrine but dislike, even disdain. And that is what he addresses in the rest of the passage. Our claims to “possessing” the truth as if it were a quantum and as if the conversation were a zero sum game is what is perhaps the foremost expression in theological circles of that dislike/disdain. Oh, and we have done terrible things to one another in history. For those seeking to remain apart, there are myriad excuses which can be rehearsed for an eternity–almost. Eternity who is Love whom we claim to follow has no use for bitterness, nor rancor, nor division. He has room only for reconciliation and unity as Christ and the Father are one.
The unity of the Father and the Son (and the Holy Spirit) is a radical one. It is a mutual indwelling. And, it is for that unity that Christ so fervently prayed.
Unity is not some PC concept. It is not and option. Unity is a duty.
March 28, 2008 at 6:39 pm
We know that there are many on both sides who do not wish us to re-unite. I do believe that H.B. Bartholomew and the Patriarchate of Constantinople are more willing than some of the others to re-unite.
March 29, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Prayers for Patriarch Bartholomew and Pope Benedict.
It is a hard thing indeed. As a person who was in a diocese following in the same path as they are undertaking, I can say that there are strong feelings against any re-union, and often done in a hardness of heart where the Faith is, as Patriarch Athenagoras says, a weapon and no longer about our relation with the Living God, but about protecting ourselves and what we are used to.
In reading the excerpt, I was reminded how I am continually amazed in my readings at how confrontational the West and East became over time. Things got more rigid over time, and the split that was not so much a split in the first centuries, became more and more defensive and confrontational.