Happy Feast of the Ascension!

May 21, 2009

I would like to wish all 8 of my faithful readers a very blessed Feast of the Ascension of Our Lord.

Yes, I know, in most dioceses in the United States, the feast has been moved to Sunday; ostensibly because fewer people would actually come to Mass on a Thursday (same story with the Feast of the Epiphany) but I don’t buy it!

Frankly, friends, with regard to Mass attendance, the Catholic Church does not demand a whole lot. Sundays, and a small handful of Holy Days of Obligation. Heck, if we were Baptists, it would be Sunday morning AND Sunday evening AND Wednesday evening! (And a much higher percentage of our income would be expected!)

I’d love to see the Feast observed on its correct day, and to hear sung those glorious Ascension Day hymns that so few people know anymore. Five years ago, prior to my conversion, I was doing some research in Oxford (yes, poor me! And the library was literally steps away from the Eagle and Child! But I digress). I was staying at St. Stephan’s House, Oxford — a rather “high church” Anglican seminary. On Ascension Day, I was invited by some of the students to accompany them up to the roof of the chapel (via a typical medieval castle-style winding staircase) where we gathered and sang an Ascension Day hymn. I believe it was “See the Conqueror Mount In Triumph” or “Hail the Day that Sees Him Rise”. It was wonderful!

Besides the two hymns listed above, my other favorite Ascension Day hymn is “Hail Thee Festival Day”.

Anyone else have a favorite?


Mary Ann to Notre Dame . . .

April 27, 2009

. . . thanks, but no thanks!

“First Things” and “American Papist” are announcing that Ambassador Mary Ann Glendon has decided to refuse Notre Dame University’s “Laetare Medal”.

http://www.americanpapist.com/labels/notre%20dame%20scandal.html

God bless her!


Catholic College Refuses to Allow Condom Distribution

March 5, 2009

Why should the school’s policy come as a shock?

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/03/05/catholic_college_bars_students_free_condoms/

Seems to me that a student who attends a Catholic college should be able to “get” this concept!


Archbishop Dolan to New York

February 23, 2009

Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan has officially been appointed as the next Archbishop of New York. As a Catholic in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee, I can tell you that the good Archbishop will be greatly missed. Our loss is certainly New York’s gain. My fervent prayers and best wishes go to Archbishop Dolan as he undertakes his new responsibilities.


Yes, I know that this one is personal . . .

February 7, 2009

One of the neat things about a blog, is that the blogger can write pretty much what he wishes, on pretty much whatever topic he wishes!

Well, right now, I’m going to brag on my eldest son!

David, Jr. is 18 and is in his senior year at St. Lawrence Seminary High School.

2009 has certainly been good to him!

A few weeks ago, we learned that the Archdiocese of Milwaukee has accepted him as a college seminarian. He will be attending St. Joseph College Seminary, which is located on the campus of Loyola University in Chicago.

Yesterday, we learned that he has been chosen for induction into the National Honor Society at St. Lawrence.

Our family could not possibly be more pleased and proud!

God is good, and He has a very nice Mother!

Papa Z


Request for Prayers

January 24, 2009

I just received word that my first cousin and her family lost their home and all their material possessions last night in a house fire. I can’t even begin to imagine what they are going through right now. Praise God everyone is safe. Thank God for His promises of Divine Mercy.

Please remember this family in your prayers.

Blessings,

Papa Z


Some Ruminations on Eastern Orthodoxy

January 19, 2009

DISCLAIMER: Neither in this post, nor in any post which might follow, is any personal slight intended against any particular person or congregation within the umbrella of Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Nor is it an attempt to call into question issues regarding validity of Sacraments, etc. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states:

The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter. Those “who believe in Christ and are properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect communion with the Catholic Church.” With the Orthodox Churches, this communion is so profound “that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord’s Eucharist. (Paragraph #838 — emphasis in the original text).

I fully embrace this statement. What I am attempting to do, is to address and discuss some of the issues, myths, and polemic which seem to be common among certain circles of Orthodox apologetics. Reasonable and rational dialogue — and disagreement — is gladly welcomed.

The Myth of the Five Patriarchs
In much of modern Orthodox apologetic, there is a great deal of emphasis on the idea that in the Early Church, the Five Patriarchal Sees of Christianity (Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, Jerusalem, and Rome) existed in a certain organic unity, with the Bishop of Rome being recognized as first among equals, but bearing no jurisdictional authority over the other four sees. Then, in AD 1054, Rome veered off on her own — and the four other sees remained (and remain) in unity — all the while waiting for Rome to recognize the error of her ways and return to the fold. A picture very similar to this was described in detail in Peter Gilquist’s book Becoming Orthodox. While there are a number of things about this theory which give pause (and which I may address in future posts) the notion of five unified patriarchates, marching through the centuries together, just doesn’t pass historical muster. Let’s look at the facts:

Jerusalem: Obviously, Jerusalem was the home of the Early Church. When the other Apostles began traveling the world (known and unknown) the church in this city was led by St. James, who was martyred a few years before the beginning of the 1st Jewish/Roman War — a war which led to the capture of the city and the destruction of the Temple in AD 70. From AD 70 until the time of the 2nd Jewish/Roman War in the AD 130’s, a succession of Jewish Christians served as bishops of Jerusalem. At the end of the 2nd Jewish/Roman War, Jerusalem was completely laid waste and rebuilt as a Roman city named AElia. For the next 200 years, a succession of Gentile Christians served as bishops of AElia — which was no longer considered an important church — and became, in fact, a suffragan see of Caesarea. It was not until the time of Constantine that the church in Jerusalem regained its previous importance. The First Council of Nicaea (AD 325) recognized Patriarchal honors for Jerusalem — but Caesarea was still the Metropolitan see! Jerusalem did not gain full Patriarchal status until the Council of Chalcedon (AD 451). From AD 451 until AD 636, a succession of Patriarchs led the church in Jerusalem; one was a Monophysite and many struggled with both Monophysitism and Monothelitism. The city (and Patriarchate) was overrun by Muslims in AD 636. From AD 636 until AD 705, the see was vacant — and administered by a Papal legate! From AD 705 until AD 1099, the Patriarchs were imfluenced primarily by the Eastern Church and participated in the Schism in AD 1054. When the armies of the 1st Crusade delivered Jerusalem from the Muslims in AD 1099, a Latin Patriarchate was set up, influenced by Rome, which lasted until AD 1291. Over the last 700+ years, both the size (never large to begin with) and the importance (never great) of the Orthodox Jerusalem Patriarchate has gradually diminished. In the 13th century, the Latin Patriarch effectively ended and was not restored until the 19th century.

Antioch: According to the Acts of the Apostles, it was in Antioch where the followers of Jesus were first called Christians. One of the first seven deacons hailed from Antioch; St. Paul and St. Barnabas ministered there as did St. Peter prior to his arrival in Rome. After the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70, Antioch was functionally the center of Christianity in the East. St. Ignatius of Antioch, third bishop of the city, died a martyr in AD 117; his writings are of utmost importance in understanding the polity and worship of the very Early Church. The first two Ecumenical Councils of the Church (the 1st Council of Nicaea in AD 325 and the 1st Council of Constantinople in AD 381) pointed to the great importance and influence of the Patriarchate of Antioch. However, the Council of Ephesus in AD 431 and the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451 stripped territory from Antioch and the Patriarchate in Constantinople assumed (and in some cases usurped) a much more significant role in Eastern Christianity. In the middle of the 5th century, Antioch suffered great losses to the Nestorians; by the end of the 5th century, the Monophysites attempted to seize the Patriarchate; and by the 6th century were electing their own Patriarch. In the 7th century, Antioch was overrun by the Muslims, and while the line of Monophysite Patriarchs remained intact, the line of Orthodox Patriarchs was irregular at best. What was left of the Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch followed Constantinople into schism in AD 1054, but by that time, the church was but a shadow of its former self. During the Crusades, from AD 1098 to AD 1268, there was a brief — and unsuccessful — restoration of a Latin Patriarchate. At the present time, three Eastern Rite Catholic Churches currently have Patriarchs of Antioch, the Orthodox Patriarch still exists, much diminished, in spite of its expansion into North America, and the Monophysite (now called “Oriental” or “Non-Chalcedonian”) Patriarch still exists.

Alexandria: According to tradition in both the Eastern and Western Churches, the Church in Alexandria was founded by St. Mark (John Mark) the cousin of St. Barnabas and sometime companion of St. Barnabas, St. Paul, and St. Peter. The most noteworthy bishop of that city in antiquity was St. Athanasius, the great defender of Trinitarian orthodoxy in the face of Arianism in the 4th century. Until the time of the 1st Council of Constantinople in AD 381, the Patriarch of Alexandria ranked next to the Bishop of Rome. The 28th Canon of Constantinople I, which elevated the Patriarch of Constantinople above Alexandria was not recognized by either Rome or Alexandria for many years. St. Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria from AD 412 to AD 444 fiercely opposed the heresy of Nestorianism, culminating the the condemnation of that heresy at the 3rd Ecumenical Council — the Council of Ephesus in AD 431. However, in the struggle against Nestorianism, Alexandrian Christianity went to the other extreme, and by the middle of the 5th century was deeply embroiled in Monophysitism. By the end of the 5th century, schism in Alexandria was complete — and permenant. When Alexandria was overrun by the Muslims in the 7th century, the invasion was supported by the Monophysites at the expense of the orthodox, Catholic hierarchy which was greatly diminished. By the 9th century, the Patriarchate was merely a shadow of its former self. A temporary reunion between the Monophysite Copts and Rome was effected in AD 1442 by the Council of Florence, etc., but lasted only a short time. Today, the ancient see of Alexandria is almost entirely desended from the Monophysite (now “Oriental”) Coptic church. While both East and West still maintain their respective Patriarchs, their numbers are extremely small.

Constantinople: The first historically known bishop of the city which became Constantinople was St. Metrophanes (AD 306 to AD 314). The see was at first not an important one and was subject to the authority of the metropolitan of Heraclea. In AD 381 at the 1st Council of Constantinople, the see was raised to the dignity of the Patriarchate — not for any religious or historic reason, but only because Constantinople had become the Imperial city. This decision was bitterly resented and opposed by both Rome and Alexandria. Between AD 381 and the Council of Chalcedon in AD 451, the Patriarchate of Constantinople grew enormously in both size and importance primarily by usurping dioceses from other provinces and metropolitan sees. Over a period of several hundred years, Constantinople was in and out of communion with the West for a variety of reasons. Some were political in nature and some were issues of heresy. During the time between the death of the Emperor Constantine in AD 337 and the final breach with Rome in AD 1054, 19 Patriarchs of Constantinople were open heretics and the see was in formal schism for at least 248 years. Constantinople was at times Arian (55 years), Monothelite (41 years), and Iconclastic (90 years). After the sack of Constantinope by the armies of the 4th Crusade, a Latin Patriarchate was set up which was never large — and never successful. Attempts at reunion between Rome and Constantinope were made at the Council of Lyon in AD 1274 and at the Council of Florence, etc., in the 15th century. Both attempts were repudiated by the East within a few years. Constantinople fell to the Turks in AD 1453 and the great church of Hagia Sophia became a mosque. Constantinople, now called Istanbul, remains in Turkish hands and the Patriarch of Constantinople is required by Turkish law to be a Turkish citizen. Relations between the Turkish state and the Church are, at best, strained and tense. Titles and ancient history notwithstanding, in the world of 21st century Eastern Orthodoxy, the number of Orthodox faithful under the spiritual care of Constantinople is a very small minority.

What does this brief history of the churches in Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, and Constantinople show us? It demonstrates that there never — never — was a time in which the scenario described by many modern Orthodox apologists (including converts) as the authentic Early Church actually existed! Constantinople was not granted full Patriarchal status until AD 381; Jerusalem was not granted full Patriarchal status until AD 451, and by the end of the 5th century, both Antioch and Alexandria had become hopelessly divided into rival parties — each with its own Patriarch — and these divisions exist to the present day.

In short, from an honest reading of history, an Orthodox apologetic requiring five unified Patriarchs, cannot stand.

Papa Z


Avery, Cardinal Dulles — Rest in Peace

December 12, 2008

It is with great sadness that I announce to my (six) readers the death this morning of Avery, Cardinal Dulles, SJ. He was 90 years old.

Cardinal Dulles was arguably the most significant American theologian of the century, and possibly the foremost ecclesiologist in the world. Indeed, we even used his “Models of the Church” at Oral Roberts University!

I had the great privilege of meeting Cardinal (then Father) Dulles while I was a student at Nashotah House. We had a academic convocation each November, and Fr. Dulles was one of the featured speakers. We had just suffered through an interminable (and awful) address by some retired Episcopal bishop. Fr. Dulles was next. Very diplomatically, very kindly — and VERY thoroughly, Fr. Dulles absolutely demolished the previous speaker. So thoroughly, in fact, that our Systematic Theology/Liturgy professor at the seminary (who was more sympathetic, I’m afraid, to the heretical bishop than to Fr. Dulles) visibly extremely uncomfortable! It was a joy to behold.

Following the convocation, I had the honor to ride back to the airport with Fr. Dulles. I am most privileged to have in my personal collection several of his books, which he graciously signed for me.

Cardinal Dulles’s death will leave an incredible void in theological circles — and, no doubt, among his Jesuit brothers. May his soul and the souls of all the faithful departed through the mercy of God, rest in peace.


In Memorium — Fr. James LeBar

February 25, 2008

This morning, I learned of the death of Fr. James LeBar. Fr. LeBar was a close friend and mentor to my own dear friend Fr. Ken Yossa. He was, for many years, the chief exorcist for the Archdiocese of New York, and was one of the most prominent figures in this very specialized ministry in the entire world.

My friend Fr. Yossa is a Byzantine Catholic priest (Romanian Rite) who is godfather to my son Philip and who was present at my own reception into the Church. He forwarded to me this prayer which seems most appropriate for the occasion. It is taken from the Byzantine Funeral Office for a Priest:

O Lord, our God, we see your departed priestly servant James and all the works performed by him in your Church. Now that he has departed by your will, we beseech you O solicitous Master, in your loving kindness, forgive him all his transgressions—committed deliberately or through human frailty—and that you admit him to the region of the living, to the place of light where all the saints repose. For you are the resurrection, the life and the repose of your priestly servant James, O Christ our God, and we glorify you, together with your eternal Father and your all holy Spirit, now and ever, and forever. Amen.


A personal reflection — about a dear friend

February 22, 2008

This is a very different — and difficult — post for me.

Today, I would like to recognize the life of Ken Jablonski. Ken died 15 years ago, sometime between the hours of 4 and 8 AM on February 22nd, 1993. He was 34 years old. He had suffered from severe kidney disease, leading to total kidney failure (and two failed transplants). He had survived more than 20 years of kidney dialysis. He was also, for the many years that I knew him, totally blind. Early in the morning of February 22nd, 1993, while waiting for the taxi to take him to his thrice-weekly dialysis treatment, he suffered what appeared to be a fatal heart attack. When the taxi company called the authorities to report his non-appearance that fatal morning, the police found his body on the living room floor, reaching for the phone.

At the request of his family, I was in charge of his funeral arrangements, and the disposition of most of his material goods.

Ken was a unique man. In spite of his physical disabilities — and his blindness — he was a musician of extraordinary skill — on the piano, the guitar, and the electric guitar — as well as being a gifted composer. He had one of the most profound — and funny — senses of humor that I have ever encountered in my life. Reading from a Braille manuscript, he proclaimed the Old Testament Lesson at my wedding, and remained very interested in my family life until his untimely death. (He died when my oldest son was 2 1/2 years old, and one month before my oldest daughter was born.)

Ken was an honest man; a generous man; a giving man; and a godly man. To the very end of his life, he was concerned about the needs and hurts of others. Upon his death, one of the tasks which fell to me was to “clean out” his computer — and I found many more examples of his kindness and decency about which I had no knowledge — even as his closest friend.

One final example: about four months prior to his death, Ken had the opportunity to meet the severely retarded and disabled daughter of my wife’s best friends. She was only a small child at the time. After my wife’s friends had returned home, Ken penned a letter to this little girl: a letter gripped with love and emotion. Some years after Ken’s death, this little girl died as well — and at the visitation for family and friends, Ken’s letter was posted prominently by the casket. I don’t believe I’ve ever met a more compassionate person in my entire life.

Ken, while a devout Christian, often joked about giving up “religious ritual” for Lent! And, true to form, he died just two days before Ash Wednesday! Tomorrow, while a day of abstinence, a part of me will be strongly tempted to give up — in Ken’s honor — my Lenten disciplines — just for a day.

Kenneth P. Jablonski — may you rest in peace! May your friends be as lucky as you, to remember you so faithfully! And if, perchance, I should (in your honor) stray on Friday, please intercede to the Almighty on my behalf!


The Golden Compass

December 19, 2007
SUBJECT: RELIGION!!!

Faithful readers . . . (all six of you! :-) )

Recently, I was asked by a local pastor to write a few words on “The Golden Compass”. My review has subsequently been distributed to literally hundreds of parishes, schools, and ministries all over the United States. I thought it might be of interest here.

On December 7th, the movie adaptation of Philip Pullman’s novel “The Golden Compass” – the first volume of “His Dark Materials” trilogy – will be released. With the stunning successes of “The Lord of the Rings”, “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe”, and the various “Harry Potter” movies, expectations are high that “The Golden Compass” will also be a box-office hit. Many parents will, no doubt, be strongly pressured by their young children to see the film and will subsequently purchase the novel and its sequels.

At the same time, serious concerns have been raised from a number of sources about both the intentions of the author and of the appropriateness of the novel’s content, especially for persons of faith. As both a parent and as an expert in science fiction and fantasy literature, I was asked to read “The Golden Compass” and to try to address some of these concerns.

First, and foremost, Philip Pullman is an outspoken atheist. He has openly admitted that his books are about “killing God”. Indeed, in the final volume of the trilogy, several characters do “kill God”. The protagonists of the story (pre-adolescent children) spend much of their time fighting off the evil machinations of “The Magisterium” – a thinly-disguised Catholic Church stereotype, complete with priests, sacraments, and even a Vatican Council. Members of the Magisterium kidnap children in order to perform vile scientific experiments attempting to separate the soul (each person’s daemon) from the body. The opponents of the Magisterium (also using a sacrificed child) discover a way to cross between worlds and mount an attack on God.

Next, for someone merely viewing the movie trailer, a “Narnia” type adventure, complete with talking animals, etc, is what would probably be expected. Again, this is deliberate on the part of Pullman who loathes the Narnia cycle, calling it “one of the most ugly and poisonous things I’ve ever read”. In other words, the author has written an “anti-Narnia” in which the concepts of good and evil are reversed and moral relativism is rampant. What is especially disturbing is that “His Dark Materials” trilogy is being aggressively marketed to pre-adolescent children and young teens – the same audience as Narnia.

Because of Pullman’s militant atheism, the movie treatment of “The Golden Compass” has toned down the anti-religious, anti-Catholic bias tremendously. Frankly, the production company was afraid of a financial disaster if the novel had been more literally adapted. Nevertheless, the concern remains. Just as the writings of JRR Tolkien and CS Lewis enjoyed a re-birth of popularity following the release of the film treatments of their respective novels, it can be expected that sales of “His Dark Materials” (and related merchandise) will receive an equal boost. If this occurs, we can only expect that the blatant message presented in the novels will become ever more blatant in future films.

Finally, I would encourage parents to use the occasion of this film release as an opportunity for a “teaching moment” about our Catholic faith and identity. We have the first and primary responsibility for the education of our children, and it is we who have the ability – and credibility – with our children to teach right from wrong; good from evil; that moral decisions are not relative; and that “the ends do not justify the means”.


More CEC Fallout

June 5, 2007

Greetings, all,

I have recently received a very kind message from Bp. Fred Fick, sometime CEC bishop of the Great Lakes.

Bp. Fick informs me that while he participated in some of the preliminary discussions which led to the formation of the Communion of Christ the Redeemer; after much prayer and discernment, he has declined to participate in that endeavor. Instead, he is seeking the fellowship of conservative Anglicans within the Continuing Movement.

I pray that Bp. Fick and his family and friends find the Will of God for their unique situation, as I am sure that they continue to pray for us.

God bless you, Bp. Fick.


What Has the CEC Learned?

May 7, 2007

SUBJECT: RELIGION!!!

Apparently, the leadership of the CEC has not learned much from the events of the past 12-18 months. I just received — unsolicited — an e-mail from a long-time CEC priest in the Southeast who yesterday announced that he and his congregation were moving from the CEC to the newly formed Communion of Christ the Redeemer (CCR).

Within hours — literally within hours — the CEC leader in his state demanded the return of his ordination certificates, denounced him as a vow-breaker, and has already begun efforts to seize his church’s property. And this against a man who has served as a priest for more than a decade.

For crying out loud, people, WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED???

WHEN WILL THIS NONSENSE STOP???

What is to be gained by this continued persecution?

When will the current leadership in the CEC realize that they bear enormous responsibility for the events of the last 18 months?

You know, I’ve heard a lot of talk about “healing” and “moving forward” and even admission of “communication breakdowns”, etc. But I don’t see the actions suiting the words.


Further Thoughts on the CEC

April 18, 2007

Thanks to David B. for his previous kind remarks. I thought that under the circumstances, I ought to “cross-post”. Blessings!

It’s been awhile since I’ve posted on this blog. Much of my time has been spent moderating several sections of the Ancient-Future Catholic forum, owned by fellow blogger David Bennett. Some months ago, we decided mutually that the time had come to shut down discussions of the CEC on that forum, and overall, I believe that this has been a wise move. Some CEC discussion has continued on the On Our Way Home forum, but at a much slower, and less frenetic pace than before.

Now that the dust has cleared somewhat, we can perhaps have a better picture as to what has actually happened, and what is still going on.

Total Episcopal Departures from the CEC since May 2006:

Bishop Philip Zampino, formerly Bishop of the Mid-Atlantic Diocese and Abbot General; now Prelate of the Communion of Corpus Christi.

Bishop Fred Fick, formerly Bishop of the Great Lakes Diocese; now a bishop in the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Bishop Don Miles, formerly assistant Bishop of the Great Lakes Diocese; now a bishop in the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Bishop Rich Lipka, formerly Bishop of Delmarva Diocese; now the President of the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Bishop Phil Weeks, formerly Missionary Bishop for the CEC; now a bishop in the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Bishop Ken Myers, formerly Bishop of the South-Central Diocese; now Vice-President of the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Bishop Rick Painter, formerly Bishop in Arizona; now the Secretary-Treasurer of the Communion of Christ the Redeemer.

Archbishop Randy Sly, formerly Archbishop of the Eastern Province; now a layman in the Roman Catholic Church.

In addition, there have been dozens, if not hundreds of priests and deacons who have left for other bodies, dozens of churches who have left for other bodies, and thousands of laity which have left for other bodies.

The “Exodus” continues, but has been slowed to a trickle. I do expect more losses, but not nearly at the rate we’ve seen over the last 9 months or so.

Is, then, my earlier post on the demise of the CEC incorrect? To paraphrase Mark Twain: “Are the rumors of the death of the CEC greatly exaggerated?”

No, I don’t think so. It may still be possible for the CEC to survive as a meaningful entity — but I would not bet the rent on it.

What has happened positively:

There have been some positives.

1) The CEC is finally being honest about its own numbers here in the United States. For many years, those in the CEC (including those in ministry) were treated to enormous exaggerations as to churches and parishoners. In the United States, the CEC is now admitting to about 4,000 souls.

2) The CEC is finally taking a stand on doctrinal issues (like the Canon of Scripture). Lack of clarity on fundamental points of doctrine has always been a shortcoming of the denomination. It appears that this is beginning to change.

3) The CEC is finally taking a stand on a unified liturgy. This has also been a shortcoming, as not only styles of worship would vary around the country, but so also would fundamental and theological aspects of the liturgy. It is difficult to have a unified doctrine if there is no uniform liturgical worship. The CEC is finally coming to grips with this.

4) The CEC seems to be making at least a minimal attempt to regularize its reporting, both with regard to parish records and with regard to financial accountability. This may be “too little, too late” — but, nevertheless a start is being made.

HOWEVER — the NEGATIVES certainly outweigh the positives:

1) Honesty about numbers is a good thing. The numbers themselves look very bad — and when analyzed, look much worse. 4,000 persons — 90 churches. That adds up to about 45 persons per church. Not very viable. But there’s more. 6 of those congregations are cathedral parishes, which tend to be much larger than the typical CEC congregation. If we assume an average membership of 150 for those six congregations (which is conservative indeed) we’re left with about 3,100 persons in 84 parishes/missions. That adds up to about to about 37 members per congregation. But it gets worse than that. Among those 4,000 people, are between 400 and 450 clergy! For 90 churches! Most members of the CEC clergy have families, and many of those families are quite large. Just assuming an average of 4.5 members per clergy family (which again is conservative indeed) and we see between 1,800 and 2,000 members of CEC churches who are either clergy, or families of clergy. That number approaches 50%. This is not viable denominational growth!

2) Taking a stand on doctrine and on liturgy is also a good thing. However, in the case of the CEC, the stand taken is essentially “We have decided that we are a Protestant denomination”. If that is truly what they want to be, that’s fine and dandy. But that is not the song which was being sung EVEN ONE YEAR AGO, much less from the beginning of the denomination. Yet the current leadership is pretending that this is not the case. One immediately thinks of the “doublespeak” talked about in 1984. Those of us who remember how it was at the beginning cannot be fooled.

3) The beginnings of accountability are not enough. The current leadership of the CEC has still not “come clean” about the events of the past year (and honestly, much further back than that!) Clergy and laity who still ask questions are being insulted by bishops. The cries of the literally thousands who have asked for information, and yes, for justice, have been mocked and ridiculed. Attacks have been made against forums and blogs (including this one) yet certain leaders have no hesitancy in printing their own views and opinions. Lies have been told, and continue to be told. Reputations have been tarnished, and continue to be tarnished. Relationships have been broken, and continue to be broken.

In other words, in spite of the loss of 8 bishops, dozens to hundreds of clergy, and (depending on which set of figures you read) up to 75% percent of the laity in the United States, a certain cadre within the remaining leadership is still continuing “business as usual”.

I pray for those left in the CEC. I pray for healing and for reconciliation. But I also pray that “the truth will out”.


The Finger of God

April 17, 2007

The Finger of God

I’m sure that virtually all readers are still reeling at the horrific events which took place yesterday at Virginia Tech. Such mindless evil is dreadfully hard to contemplate. There are no easy answers to difficult questions.

And yet . . .

And yet . . .

Like we have seen so often before, during times of immense tragedy; amid all the suffering and pain; amid all the questions and the anger — there are also miracles. There are those who “were supposed to be somewhere, but weren’t” — and later realize that they have been spared. There are those who, in moments of unspeakable horror, act with incredible courage. There are those who “rise to the occasion”, when the need is greatest.

We see the Finger of God.

I see the Finger of God in the heroic sacrifice of a professor, who literally blockaded a classroom door with his body — so that his students could escape. Greater love hath no man.

I see the Finger of God in the presence of an Eagle Scout in one classroom, who was able to render emergency first-aid to those around him — and was never touched by a bullet.

I see the Finger of God on the life of a young man who decided to have a quick coffee with his girlfriend, rather than rush off. They are both alive today.

I see the Finger of God on the life of a young woman who, although always early, was, for some reason running late.

I see the Finger of God in the very fact that these tragedies are so rare; that this sort of wanton evil remains, for the most part, checked.

It was St. Thomas Aquinas who pointed out that if God wanted to destroy the Universe — He would not have to do anything — He would have to STOP doing something. It is His Finger on the pulse of the Universe which keeps everything going.

I grieve with all those who have lost friends and loved ones. I grieve for the loss of life — and for the loss of innocence. And I am filled with wonder and great gratitude at the little miracles — those actions by the Finger of God — which kept this terrible, terrible tragedy from being infinitely worse.

May the souls of the victims — and the souls of all the faithful departed through the mercy of God, rest in peace.